This paper presents some key concepts in studying and analyzing the aspects of communication critically. It has always been crucial and a complex phenomenon for the experts in the field of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to decode and deduce the meaning of a text through context. They examine and attribute language as a social process involving context to determine the meaning of an utterance to its producer and receiver. It has also been of great interest and enthusiasm for discourse analysts to explore and identify the underlying objective of meaning carrying an ideological message based on religious, sociopolitical, and historical assumptions. The discourse practitioners are seriously occupied with critical studies on revealing social inequality, power relations, and dominance operated through language (Wodak, 2001a). Critical studies have actively pursued such discursive practices of power dominance, the imposition of an ideology, and discrimination through text and talk. There have been important insights on sociopolitical and historical discourse serving the purpose at (macro and micro) levels of analysis (van Dijk, 1993). It suggests the use of conversation analysis, narrative analysis, rhetoric/stylistics, and media analysis. The underlying approach may be used to analyze the discourse of speeches delivered by renowned politicians, parliamentarians, and national leaders. Following van Dijk (1993) approach/model, this study aims to analyze a political speech, titled as ‘Pakistan and the Modern World’ made by the first Prime Minister of Pakistan Liaquat Ali Khan at the University of Kansas, United States of America.
Published in | Communication and Linguistics Studies (Volume 1, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.cls.20150103.11 |
Page(s) | 35-41 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Critical Discourse Analysis, Paradigm, Social Interaction, Context, Text, Discourse, Social Cognition, Ideology, Power Dominance, Speech, Kansas, America
[1] | Behnam, B. & Kazemian, B. (2013). A comparative study of ideational grammatical metaphor in scientific and political texts. The Journal of Applied Linguistics and Discourse Analysis, 1(1), 40-70. |
[2] | Choi, Y.A., 2006. Discourse analysis: A linguistic study of the French press’s representation of the political crisis in Tahiti (2004-2005) - In le figaro, le monde and la liberation (master's thesis). Retrieved from http://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/885 |
[3] | Ehineni, T.O., 2014. A critical discourse analysis of modals in Nigerian political manifestos. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(3): 109-117. doi:10.5296/ijl.v6i3.5589. |
[4] | Fowler, R. & B. Hodge. (1979). Critical Linguistics. In R. Fowler et al (Eds.). Language and Control. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul. pp. 185-213. |
[5] | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman. |
[6] | Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold. |
[7] | Johnstone, B. (2002). Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. |
[8] | Kazemian, B., Behnam, B., & Ghafoori, N. (2013). Ideational grammatical metaphor in scientific texts: a Hallidayan perspective. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(4), 146-168. ISSN 1948-5425. Macrothink institute. DOI:10.5296/ijl.v5i4.4192. |
[9] | Kazemian, B., & Hashemi, S. (2014a). Nominalizations in scientific and political genres: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (IJHSS), 3(2), 211-228. |
[10] | Kazemian, B. & Hashemi, S., (2014b). Critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama's 2012 speeches: Views from systemic functional linguistics and rhetoric. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(6): 1178-1187. doi:10.4304/tpls.4.6.1178-1187. |
[11] | Kazemian, B., & Hashemi, S. (2015). A Radical Shift to a Profound and Rigorous Investigation in Political Discourse: An Integrated Approach. in press. |
[12] | Noor, M., Ali, M., Muhabat, F. & Kazemian, B. (2015). Systemic Functional Linguistics Mood Analysis of the Last Address of the Holy Prophet (PBUH). International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Special Issue: Critical Discourse Analysis, Rhetoric, and Grammatical Metaphor in Political and Advertisement Discourses. 3(5-1), 1-9. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2015030501.11 |
[13] | Pu, C., 2007. Discourse analysis of President Bush’s speech at Tsinghua University, China. Intercultural Communication Studies, XVI(1): 205-219. http://www.uri.edu/iaics/journal/index.php |
[14] | Rashidi, N. & Souzandehfar, M., 2010. A critical discourse analysis of the debates between republicans and democrats over the continuation of war in Iraq. JoLIE (3): 55-82- http://www.uab.ro/cercetare/ciel/jolie/ |
[15] | van, Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society: 4, 249-283. London: Newbury Park. |
[16] | van, Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Study. London: Newbury Park. |
[17] | Wang, J., 2010. A Critical Discourse Analysis of Barack Obama’s Speeches. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3): 254-261. doi:10.4304/jltr.1.3.254-261. |
[18] | Wodak, R. & Mayer, M. (2001a). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. |
[19] | Wodak, R. (2001b). The Discourse of Historical Approach. In Methods of CDA. (ed.). by R. Wodak & M. Meyers. London: Sage Publication, 63-94. |
[20] | Zheng, S., 2014. A critical discourse analysis of financial remarks: A case study. International Journal of English Linguistics; 4(5): 105-116. doi:10.5539/ijel.v4n5p105. |
APA Style
Sheeraz Ali, Bahram Kazemian. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis of a Reading Text ‘Pakistan and the Modern World’: A Speech by Liaquat Ali Khan. Communication and Linguistics Studies, 1(3), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20150103.11
ACS Style
Sheeraz Ali; Bahram Kazemian. Critical Discourse Analysis of a Reading Text ‘Pakistan and the Modern World’: A Speech by Liaquat Ali Khan. Commun. Linguist. Stud. 2015, 1(3), 35-41. doi: 10.11648/j.cls.20150103.11
@article{10.11648/j.cls.20150103.11, author = {Sheeraz Ali and Bahram Kazemian}, title = {Critical Discourse Analysis of a Reading Text ‘Pakistan and the Modern World’: A Speech by Liaquat Ali Khan}, journal = {Communication and Linguistics Studies}, volume = {1}, number = {3}, pages = {35-41}, doi = {10.11648/j.cls.20150103.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20150103.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cls.20150103.11}, abstract = {This paper presents some key concepts in studying and analyzing the aspects of communication critically. It has always been crucial and a complex phenomenon for the experts in the field of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to decode and deduce the meaning of a text through context. They examine and attribute language as a social process involving context to determine the meaning of an utterance to its producer and receiver. It has also been of great interest and enthusiasm for discourse analysts to explore and identify the underlying objective of meaning carrying an ideological message based on religious, sociopolitical, and historical assumptions. The discourse practitioners are seriously occupied with critical studies on revealing social inequality, power relations, and dominance operated through language (Wodak, 2001a). Critical studies have actively pursued such discursive practices of power dominance, the imposition of an ideology, and discrimination through text and talk. There have been important insights on sociopolitical and historical discourse serving the purpose at (macro and micro) levels of analysis (van Dijk, 1993). It suggests the use of conversation analysis, narrative analysis, rhetoric/stylistics, and media analysis. The underlying approach may be used to analyze the discourse of speeches delivered by renowned politicians, parliamentarians, and national leaders. Following van Dijk (1993) approach/model, this study aims to analyze a political speech, titled as ‘Pakistan and the Modern World’ made by the first Prime Minister of Pakistan Liaquat Ali Khan at the University of Kansas, United States of America.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Critical Discourse Analysis of a Reading Text ‘Pakistan and the Modern World’: A Speech by Liaquat Ali Khan AU - Sheeraz Ali AU - Bahram Kazemian Y1 - 2015/07/23 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20150103.11 DO - 10.11648/j.cls.20150103.11 T2 - Communication and Linguistics Studies JF - Communication and Linguistics Studies JO - Communication and Linguistics Studies SP - 35 EP - 41 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2380-2529 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20150103.11 AB - This paper presents some key concepts in studying and analyzing the aspects of communication critically. It has always been crucial and a complex phenomenon for the experts in the field of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to decode and deduce the meaning of a text through context. They examine and attribute language as a social process involving context to determine the meaning of an utterance to its producer and receiver. It has also been of great interest and enthusiasm for discourse analysts to explore and identify the underlying objective of meaning carrying an ideological message based on religious, sociopolitical, and historical assumptions. The discourse practitioners are seriously occupied with critical studies on revealing social inequality, power relations, and dominance operated through language (Wodak, 2001a). Critical studies have actively pursued such discursive practices of power dominance, the imposition of an ideology, and discrimination through text and talk. There have been important insights on sociopolitical and historical discourse serving the purpose at (macro and micro) levels of analysis (van Dijk, 1993). It suggests the use of conversation analysis, narrative analysis, rhetoric/stylistics, and media analysis. The underlying approach may be used to analyze the discourse of speeches delivered by renowned politicians, parliamentarians, and national leaders. Following van Dijk (1993) approach/model, this study aims to analyze a political speech, titled as ‘Pakistan and the Modern World’ made by the first Prime Minister of Pakistan Liaquat Ali Khan at the University of Kansas, United States of America. VL - 1 IS - 3 ER -