Critical Discourse Analysis of PM N. Sharif’s UNOGA Discourse Deciphering Covert Rhetoric—Dialectical Perspective

Faiz-ur-Rehman Gill; Mehmood Ahmad Azhar

doi:doi:10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Critical Discourse Analysis of PM N. Sharif’s UNOGA Discourse Deciphering Covert Rhetoric—Dialectical Perspective

Faiz-ur-Rehman Gill, Mehmood Ahmad Azhar

Published in Communication and Linguistics Studies (Volume 4, Issue 1)

Received: 31 December 2017 Accepted: 8 February 2018 Published: 30 April 2018

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This rigorous research attempts to decipher the covert rhetoric —ideology of peace and justice—reflected in Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s UNOGA address, 2015. This paper examines the relationship between text and elements of power and ideology reflected in PM’s political discourse from dialectical perspective. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) bases on “social critique and transformative action for change on a critique of discourse” (Fairclough, 2015) and it advances from endoxa (opinion) to praxis (action) to reflect change in existing reality. The researcher employs Fairclough’s (1989, 1995) three dimensions model that includes text analysis (description), processing analysis (interpretation) and social analysis (explanation). This study also assesses Faircloughian conjecture that “ideologies embed in texts” and “texts are open to diverse interpretations” (Fairclough, 1995). The selected speech of the PM in term of corpus’ power and ideological components are critiqued and assessed. It is also attempted to decode how clandestine elements of power and ideology underpin the leaders’ discourses and how their linguistic strategies and discourses exercise power and ideologies to shape opinion of the readers or listeners to understand realities better as “using of language involves something that goes beyond the acquisition of structures” (Yalden, 1987).

Published in	Communication and Linguistics Studies (Volume 4, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12
Page(s)	14-22
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Dialectics, Rhetoric, Political Discourse, Critical Discourse Analysis, Deciphering Covert Power and Ideology, Overt Reality

References

[1]	Ali, S. & Kazemian, B. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis of a Reading Text ‘Pakistan and the Modern World’: A Speech by Liaquat Ali Khan. Communication and Linguistics Studies, 1(3), 35-41. DOI: 10.11648/j.cls.20150103.11.
[2]	Ali, S., Kazemian, B. & Bughio, F. A. (2015). An investigation of the reading text ‘Pakistan Zindabad’ (Long Live Pakistan): Critical discourse analysis perspective. Education and Linguistics Research, 1(2), 42-51. DOI:10.5296/10.5296/elr.v1i2.8160.
[3]	Amoli, F. A. (2016). The Effect of Fairclough’s Approach in Iranian Literacy Texts: Critical Discourse Analysis Perspective. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4), 658.
[4]	Bhasker, R. (1983). Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom. London: Verso.
[5]	Bhasker, R. (1989). Reclaiming Reality. London: Routledge.
[6]	Carreon, J. R., & Svetanant, C. (2017). What Lies Underneath a Political Speech? Critical Discourse Analysis of Thai PM’s Political Speeches Aired on the TV Programme Returning Happiness to the People. Open Linguistics, 3(1), 638-655.
[7]	Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.
[8]	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
[9]	Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
[10]	Fairclough, N. and Graham, P. (2002). Marx as critical discourse analyst: The genesis of a critical method and its relevance to the critique of global capital. Estudios de socioliguistica. 3 (1), 185-229.
[11]	Fairclough, N., Jessop, B. and Sayer, A. (2004). Critical realism and semiosis. In Josph, J. and Robert, J. (eds). Realism, discourse and deconstruction. London: Routledge.
[12]	Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis (2nd edition). London: Longman.
[13]	Fairclough, N., J. Mulderrig, and R. Wodak. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. In Discourse studies, (ed) van Dijk, T. pp. 357–378. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
[14]	Fairclough, N. (2015) Language and Power, 3rd Edition. London and New York: Routledge.
[15]	Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of prison. New York: Vintage.
[16]	Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G. and Trew, T. (1979). Language and control. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
[17]	Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Blackwell. In Fairclough, N. (2015) Language and Power, 3rd ed. p-51. London and New York: Routledge.
[18]	Gill, A. A., & Kausar, G. (2017). Game of hope and doubt: critical discourse analysis of pak-china economic corridor. New Horizons, 11(2), 1-109.
[19]	Heil, S. (1996). The meaning of new times. In Morley, D. and Chen, K. (eds) (1996). Critical Dialogues in Critical Studies. London: Routledge.
[20]	Hussein, I. (2016). Critical Discourse Analysis of the Political Speech of the Egyptian President, Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, at the New Suez Canal Inauguration Ceremony. International Journal of Language and Literature, 4(1), 85-106.
[21]	Karabbe, E. (2002). Meeting in the house of callias: A historical perspective on rhetoric and dialect. In Fairclough, N. (2015) Language and Power, 3rd ed. p-51. London and New York: Routledge.
[22]	Kazemian, B., &Hashemi, S. (2014). Critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama's 2012 speeches: Views from systemic functional linguistics and rhetoric. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(6), 1178-1187. DOI:10.4304/tpls.4.6.1178-1187
[23]	Kazemian, B., &Hashemi, S. (2017). A Radical Shift to a Profound and Rigorous Investigation in Political Discourse: An Integrated Approach. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(3), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n3p115
[24]	Kress, G. and Hodge, B. (1979). Language as ideology. London: Routledge&Kega Paul.
[25]	Luke, S. (2005). Power: A radical view. New York. Palgrave Macmillan.
[26]	Luke, A. (2016). Theory and practice in critical discourse analysis. In Saha, L. (ed) International Encyclopedia of the Sociology of Education, Elsevier Science Ltd.
[27]	Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London, Sage.
[28]	Penycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ, LawranceErlbaun Associates.
[29]	Peter, P. (2004). The Cambridge guide to English usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[30]	Skarp, S. (2016). Rubbish rules: a critical discourse analysis of neoliberalizing processes in Swedish waste management. Master Thesis Series in Environmental Studies and Sustainability Science.
[31]	Titscher, Stefan, Wodak, Ruth, Meyer, Michael and Vetter & Eva (1998). Methoden der Textanalyse. Opladen/Wiesbaden: WestdeutscherVerlag. In Horváth, J. (2015) Critical discourse analysis of Obama’s political discourse. Retrieved from http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~sbenus/Teaching/APTD/Horvath_CDO_Obama.pdf
[32]	Van Dijk, T. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. Sage.
[33]	Van Dijk, T. (1997). Discourse as social interaction. Sage.
[34]	Van Dijk, T. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. and Hamilton, H. (eds) A handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford; Blackwell. Pp. 352-371.
[35]	Waugh. L. R., Catalano, T., Masaeed, K. and Paul G. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis: Definition, Approaches, Relation to Pragmatics, Critique, and Trends. Faculty Publications: Department of teaching, learning and teacher education. Paper 201. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/teachlearnfacpub
[36]	Widdowson, H. G. (2004). Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford University Press.
[37]	Wodak, R., Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London, Sage.
[38]	Yalden, J. (1987). Principles of coursed designing for language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[39]	Zhou, Q. & Kazemian, B. (2015). A Rhetorical Identification Analysis of English Political Public Speaking: John F. Kennedy’s Inaugural Address. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 4(1-1), 10-16. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2016040101.12.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Faiz-ur-Rehman Gill, Mehmood Ahmad Azhar. (2018). Critical Discourse Analysis of PM N. Sharif’s UNOGA Discourse Deciphering Covert Rhetoric—Dialectical Perspective. Communication and Linguistics Studies, 4(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Faiz-ur-Rehman Gill; Mehmood Ahmad Azhar. Critical Discourse Analysis of PM N. Sharif’s UNOGA Discourse Deciphering Covert Rhetoric—Dialectical Perspective. Commun. Linguist. Stud. 2018, 4(1), 14-22. doi: 10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Faiz-ur-Rehman Gill, Mehmood Ahmad Azhar. Critical Discourse Analysis of PM N. Sharif’s UNOGA Discourse Deciphering Covert Rhetoric—Dialectical Perspective. Commun Linguist Stud. 2018;4(1):14-22. doi: 10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12,
  author = {Faiz-ur-Rehman Gill and Mehmood Ahmad Azhar},
  title = {Critical Discourse Analysis of PM N. Sharif’s UNOGA Discourse Deciphering Covert Rhetoric—Dialectical Perspective},
  journal = {Communication and Linguistics Studies},
  volume = {4},
  number = {1},
  pages = {14-22},
  doi = {10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cls.20180401.12},
  abstract = {This rigorous research attempts to decipher the covert rhetoric —ideology of peace and justice—reflected in Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s UNOGA address, 2015. This paper examines the relationship between text and elements of power and ideology reflected in PM’s political discourse from dialectical perspective. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) bases on “social critique and transformative action for change on a critique of discourse” (Fairclough, 2015) and it advances from endoxa (opinion) to praxis (action) to reflect change in existing reality. The researcher employs Fairclough’s (1989, 1995) three dimensions model that includes text analysis (description), processing analysis (interpretation) and social analysis (explanation). This study also assesses Faircloughian conjecture that “ideologies embed in texts” and “texts are open to diverse interpretations” (Fairclough, 1995). The selected speech of the PM in term of corpus’ power and ideological components are critiqued and assessed. It is also attempted to decode how clandestine elements of power and ideology underpin the leaders’ discourses and how their linguistic strategies and discourses exercise power and ideologies to shape opinion of the readers or listeners to understand realities better as “using of language involves something that goes beyond the acquisition of structures” (Yalden, 1987).},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Critical Discourse Analysis of PM N. Sharif’s UNOGA Discourse Deciphering Covert Rhetoric—Dialectical Perspective
AU  - Faiz-ur-Rehman Gill
AU  - Mehmood Ahmad Azhar
Y1  - 2018/04/30
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12
T2  - Communication and Linguistics Studies
JF  - Communication and Linguistics Studies
JO  - Communication and Linguistics Studies
SP  - 14
EP  - 22
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2380-2529
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12
AB  - This rigorous research attempts to decipher the covert rhetoric —ideology of peace and justice—reflected in Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s UNOGA address, 2015. This paper examines the relationship between text and elements of power and ideology reflected in PM’s political discourse from dialectical perspective. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) bases on “social critique and transformative action for change on a critique of discourse” (Fairclough, 2015) and it advances from endoxa (opinion) to praxis (action) to reflect change in existing reality. The researcher employs Fairclough’s (1989, 1995) three dimensions model that includes text analysis (description), processing analysis (interpretation) and social analysis (explanation). This study also assesses Faircloughian conjecture that “ideologies embed in texts” and “texts are open to diverse interpretations” (Fairclough, 1995). The selected speech of the PM in term of corpus’ power and ideological components are critiqued and assessed. It is also attempted to decode how clandestine elements of power and ideology underpin the leaders’ discourses and how their linguistic strategies and discourses exercise power and ideologies to shape opinion of the readers or listeners to understand realities better as “using of language involves something that goes beyond the acquisition of structures” (Yalden, 1987).
VL  - 4
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Faiz-ur-Rehman Gill

Department of English Language and Literature, Lahore Leeds University, Lahore, Pakistan
Mehmood Ahmad Azhar

Department of English Language and Literature, Lahore Leeds University, Lahore, Pakistan

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Faiz-ur-Rehman Gill, Mehmood Ahmad Azhar. (2018). Critical Discourse Analysis of PM N. Sharif’s UNOGA Discourse Deciphering Covert Rhetoric—Dialectical Perspective. Communication and Linguistics Studies, 4(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Faiz-ur-Rehman Gill; Mehmood Ahmad Azhar. Critical Discourse Analysis of PM N. Sharif’s UNOGA Discourse Deciphering Covert Rhetoric—Dialectical Perspective. Commun. Linguist. Stud. 2018, 4(1), 14-22. doi: 10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Faiz-ur-Rehman Gill, Mehmood Ahmad Azhar. Critical Discourse Analysis of PM N. Sharif’s UNOGA Discourse Deciphering Covert Rhetoric—Dialectical Perspective. Commun Linguist Stud. 2018;4(1):14-22. doi: 10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12,
  author = {Faiz-ur-Rehman Gill and Mehmood Ahmad Azhar},
  title = {Critical Discourse Analysis of PM N. Sharif’s UNOGA Discourse Deciphering Covert Rhetoric—Dialectical Perspective},
  journal = {Communication and Linguistics Studies},
  volume = {4},
  number = {1},
  pages = {14-22},
  doi = {10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cls.20180401.12},
  abstract = {This rigorous research attempts to decipher the covert rhetoric —ideology of peace and justice—reflected in Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s UNOGA address, 2015. This paper examines the relationship between text and elements of power and ideology reflected in PM’s political discourse from dialectical perspective. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) bases on “social critique and transformative action for change on a critique of discourse” (Fairclough, 2015) and it advances from endoxa (opinion) to praxis (action) to reflect change in existing reality. The researcher employs Fairclough’s (1989, 1995) three dimensions model that includes text analysis (description), processing analysis (interpretation) and social analysis (explanation). This study also assesses Faircloughian conjecture that “ideologies embed in texts” and “texts are open to diverse interpretations” (Fairclough, 1995). The selected speech of the PM in term of corpus’ power and ideological components are critiqued and assessed. It is also attempted to decode how clandestine elements of power and ideology underpin the leaders’ discourses and how their linguistic strategies and discourses exercise power and ideologies to shape opinion of the readers or listeners to understand realities better as “using of language involves something that goes beyond the acquisition of structures” (Yalden, 1987).},
 year = {2018}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Critical Discourse Analysis of PM N. Sharif’s UNOGA Discourse Deciphering Covert Rhetoric—Dialectical Perspective
AU  - Faiz-ur-Rehman Gill
AU  - Mehmood Ahmad Azhar
Y1  - 2018/04/30
PY  - 2018
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12
T2  - Communication and Linguistics Studies
JF  - Communication and Linguistics Studies
JO  - Communication and Linguistics Studies
SP  - 14
EP  - 22
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2380-2529
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20180401.12
AB  - This rigorous research attempts to decipher the covert rhetoric —ideology of peace and justice—reflected in Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s UNOGA address, 2015. This paper examines the relationship between text and elements of power and ideology reflected in PM’s political discourse from dialectical perspective. Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) bases on “social critique and transformative action for change on a critique of discourse” (Fairclough, 2015) and it advances from endoxa (opinion) to praxis (action) to reflect change in existing reality. The researcher employs Fairclough’s (1989, 1995) three dimensions model that includes text analysis (description), processing analysis (interpretation) and social analysis (explanation). This study also assesses Faircloughian conjecture that “ideologies embed in texts” and “texts are open to diverse interpretations” (Fairclough, 1995). The selected speech of the PM in term of corpus’ power and ideological components are critiqued and assessed. It is also attempted to decode how clandestine elements of power and ideology underpin the leaders’ discourses and how their linguistic strategies and discourses exercise power and ideologies to shape opinion of the readers or listeners to understand realities better as “using of language involves something that goes beyond the acquisition of structures” (Yalden, 1987).
VL  - 4
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download