Araneae are widely distributed in all types of environment. The group usually served as pest controllers in most agrosystem habitat. Yet, they are poorly known in the Philippines. This paper aimed to provide information on the diversity and distribution of Araneae in three habitat types: roadside, nearby stream, and mixed dipterocarp area within the ecological site using time constraint and transect walk sampling. Data revealed 5 families namely Araneidae, Clubionidae, Sparassidae, Salticidae and Tetragnathidae. The habitat nearby stream had the most number of species (22). Most of them are Araneidae (12), Clubionidae (1), Salticidae (6), Sparassidae (1) and Tetragnathidae (2). While the roadside area had only Araneidae (7) and Tetragnathidae (7) and in the mixed dipterocarp had three families: Tetragnathidae (2), Sparassidae (1) and Araneidae (3). Species richness based on Shannon Weiner Diversity Index, showed highest at the nearby stream (H'=1.085), followed by the roadside (H'=1.048) and lowest at the dipterocarp forest (H'=0.436). The distribution of Araneae species at CEDAR Impasug-ong, Bukidnon is uneven. The nearby stream had dominated by Araneidae because members are associated shrub and herbs plants along the stream with their webs hang on the flyways of most insects. The roadside and dipterocarp were dominated with tall mahogany (Swietenia mahogani) and lauan (Shorea contorta) were the habitat for the Sparassidae and Araneidae. Results suggest that Araneae favors the stream as their microhabitat in CEDAR, Bukidnon.
Published in | Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (Volume 2, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.eeb.20170206.12 |
Page(s) | 101-109 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Spiders, Araneae, Diversity
[1] | World Spider Catalog. (2016). World Spider Catalog. Natural Museum, online at http://wsc.nmbe.ch.version17.0.accessed on January 31, 2016. |
[2] | Sewlal, J. A. N., & Cutler, B. (2003). Annotated list of spider families (Araneida) of Trinidad and Tobago. |
[3] | Barrion AT. (2001). Spiders: natural biological control agents against pest in Philippine rice fields. Transactions of the national Academy of Science and Technology, Philippines 23, 121-130. |
[4] | Enriquez CMD and Nuñeza, OM. (2014). Cave spiders in Mindanao, Philippines. Extreme Life, Biospeology, & Astrobiology- International Journal of the Bioflux Society 6(1), 46-55. |
[5] | Ballentes MG, MOhagan AB, Gapud VP, Espallardo MCP, Zarcilla MO. (2006). Arthropod Faunal Diversity and Relevant Interrelationships of Critical Resources in Mt. Malindang, Misamis Occidental Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), p. 1-166. |
[6] | Chua JC, Uba MO, Carvajal TM. 2014. A Rapid Assessment of spider diversity in Kabigan Falls, Pagudpud, Ilocos Norte, Philippines. Journal of Systematic Biology 8, 16-26. |
[7] | Kremen C, Colwell RK, Erwin TI, Murphy DD, Noss RF, Sanjayan MA. (1993). Terrestrial arthropod assemblages their use in conservation planning. Conservation Biology 7, 796-808. |
[8] | Lee, J. H. & Kim, S. T. (2001). Use of spiders as natural enemies to control rice pest in Korea. Food and Fertilizer Technology Center. |
[9] | Maefait JP, Hendrickx F. (1998). Spiders as biological indicators of anthropogenic stress in natural and semi-natural habitats in Flanders (Belgium): Some recent developments. In: Selden PA, Ed. Proceedings of the 17th European Colloquim of Arachnology. Edinburgh. 293-300. |
[10] | Miyashita, T. (1997), Factors affecting the difference in foraging success in three co-existing Cyclosa Spiders. Journal of Zoology, 242: 137–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb02935.x. |
[11] | Chetia, P., & Kalita, D. K. (2012). Diversity and distribution of spiders from Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, India. |
[12] | Platnick, Norman I. (2014). The world spider catalog, version 14.5. American Museum of Natural History. doi: 10.5531/db.iz.0001 |
[13] | Rodrigues, E. N., Mendonça Jr, M. D. S., Rodrigues, P. E., & Ott, R. (2015). Diversity, composition and phenology of araneid orb-weavers (Araneae, Araneidae) associated with riparian forests in southern Brazil. Iheringia. Série Zoologia, 105(1), 53-61. |
[14] | Romero, G. Q., & Vasconcellos-Neto, J. (2005). Spatial distribution and microhabitat preference of Psecas chapoda (Peckham & Peckham) (Araneae, Salticidae). Journal of Arachnology, 33(1), 124-134. |
[15] | Romero, G. Q. (2006). Geographic Range, Habitats, and Host Plants of Bromeliad‐living Jumping Spiders (Salticidae) 1. Biotropica, 38(4), 522-530. |
[16] | Gillespie, R. G., & Reimer, N. (1993). The effect of alien predatory ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on Hawaiian endemic spiders (Araneae: Tetragnathidae). Pacific Science, 47(1), 21-33. |
[17] | Juario JV, Nuneza OM, Dupo, AL. (2016). Species richness in spiders in Sacred Mountain, Marawi Cit. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences. Vopl8 no. 1 p 86-94 |
[18] | Pinkus Rendón, M. A., Ibarra-Nú; atnez, G., Parra-Tabla, V., García-Ballinas, J. A., & Hénaut, Y. (2006). Spider diversity in coffee plantations with different management in Southeast Mexico. Journal of Arachnology, 34(1), 104-112. |
[19] | Truong, H. (2012). Coloration in relation to ecology in the Asian spiny-backed spider, Thelacantha brevispina (Araneae, Araneidae) on Moorea, French Polynesia. |
[20] | Adams, M. R. (2000). Choosing hunting sites: web site preferences of the orb weaver spider, Neoscona crucifera, relative to light cues. Journal of insect behavior, 13(3), 299-305. |
[21] | Pollard, S. D., & Jackson, R. R. (1982). The biology of Clubiona cambridgei (Aranea, Clubionidae): intraspecific interactions. New Zealand journal of ecology, 44-50. |
[22] | Robert R. Jackson, Simon D. Pollard, Ximena J. Nelson, G. B. Edwards and Alberto T. Barrion (2001). Jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) that feed on nectar. Journal of Zoology, 255, pp 25-29. doi: 10.1017/S095283690100108X. |
[23] | Buchholz, S. (2009). Community structure of spiders in coastal habitats of a Mediterranean delta region (Nestos Delta, NE, Greece). Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 32(2), 101-115. |
[24] | Nyffeler, M. (2000). Ecological impact of spiders predation: a critical assessment of Britowe’s amd Turnbull’s estimates. Bulletin on the British Arachnological Society, 11(9), 367-373. |
[25] | Peckmezian, T. (2009). A baseline study of the spider at a Costa Rican cloud forest reserve. Cloudbridge Nature Reserve, Costa Rica. |
[26] | Ward, L. (2007). Habitat Specificity of Selected Spiders of Dominica. Texas A&M University, Study Abroad Dominica Program, 1-16. |
APA Style
Geonyzl Lepiten Alviola, Abdel Muamar Alonto Disomimba. (2017). Diversity of Spiders in Three Habitat Types in Impasug-Ong Protected Area, Bukidnon, Philippines. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 2(6), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20170206.12
ACS Style
Geonyzl Lepiten Alviola; Abdel Muamar Alonto Disomimba. Diversity of Spiders in Three Habitat Types in Impasug-Ong Protected Area, Bukidnon, Philippines. Ecol. Evol. Biol. 2017, 2(6), 101-109. doi: 10.11648/j.eeb.20170206.12
AMA Style
Geonyzl Lepiten Alviola, Abdel Muamar Alonto Disomimba. Diversity of Spiders in Three Habitat Types in Impasug-Ong Protected Area, Bukidnon, Philippines. Ecol Evol Biol. 2017;2(6):101-109. doi: 10.11648/j.eeb.20170206.12
@article{10.11648/j.eeb.20170206.12, author = {Geonyzl Lepiten Alviola and Abdel Muamar Alonto Disomimba}, title = {Diversity of Spiders in Three Habitat Types in Impasug-Ong Protected Area, Bukidnon, Philippines}, journal = {Ecology and Evolutionary Biology}, volume = {2}, number = {6}, pages = {101-109}, doi = {10.11648/j.eeb.20170206.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20170206.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.eeb.20170206.12}, abstract = {Araneae are widely distributed in all types of environment. The group usually served as pest controllers in most agrosystem habitat. Yet, they are poorly known in the Philippines. This paper aimed to provide information on the diversity and distribution of Araneae in three habitat types: roadside, nearby stream, and mixed dipterocarp area within the ecological site using time constraint and transect walk sampling. Data revealed 5 families namely Araneidae, Clubionidae, Sparassidae, Salticidae and Tetragnathidae. The habitat nearby stream had the most number of species (22). Most of them are Araneidae (12), Clubionidae (1), Salticidae (6), Sparassidae (1) and Tetragnathidae (2). While the roadside area had only Araneidae (7) and Tetragnathidae (7) and in the mixed dipterocarp had three families: Tetragnathidae (2), Sparassidae (1) and Araneidae (3). Species richness based on Shannon Weiner Diversity Index, showed highest at the nearby stream (H'=1.085), followed by the roadside (H'=1.048) and lowest at the dipterocarp forest (H'=0.436). The distribution of Araneae species at CEDAR Impasug-ong, Bukidnon is uneven. The nearby stream had dominated by Araneidae because members are associated shrub and herbs plants along the stream with their webs hang on the flyways of most insects. The roadside and dipterocarp were dominated with tall mahogany (Swietenia mahogani) and lauan (Shorea contorta) were the habitat for the Sparassidae and Araneidae. Results suggest that Araneae favors the stream as their microhabitat in CEDAR, Bukidnon.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Diversity of Spiders in Three Habitat Types in Impasug-Ong Protected Area, Bukidnon, Philippines AU - Geonyzl Lepiten Alviola AU - Abdel Muamar Alonto Disomimba Y1 - 2017/12/27 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20170206.12 DO - 10.11648/j.eeb.20170206.12 T2 - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology JF - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology JO - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology SP - 101 EP - 109 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-3762 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20170206.12 AB - Araneae are widely distributed in all types of environment. The group usually served as pest controllers in most agrosystem habitat. Yet, they are poorly known in the Philippines. This paper aimed to provide information on the diversity and distribution of Araneae in three habitat types: roadside, nearby stream, and mixed dipterocarp area within the ecological site using time constraint and transect walk sampling. Data revealed 5 families namely Araneidae, Clubionidae, Sparassidae, Salticidae and Tetragnathidae. The habitat nearby stream had the most number of species (22). Most of them are Araneidae (12), Clubionidae (1), Salticidae (6), Sparassidae (1) and Tetragnathidae (2). While the roadside area had only Araneidae (7) and Tetragnathidae (7) and in the mixed dipterocarp had three families: Tetragnathidae (2), Sparassidae (1) and Araneidae (3). Species richness based on Shannon Weiner Diversity Index, showed highest at the nearby stream (H'=1.085), followed by the roadside (H'=1.048) and lowest at the dipterocarp forest (H'=0.436). The distribution of Araneae species at CEDAR Impasug-ong, Bukidnon is uneven. The nearby stream had dominated by Araneidae because members are associated shrub and herbs plants along the stream with their webs hang on the flyways of most insects. The roadside and dipterocarp were dominated with tall mahogany (Swietenia mahogani) and lauan (Shorea contorta) were the habitat for the Sparassidae and Araneidae. Results suggest that Araneae favors the stream as their microhabitat in CEDAR, Bukidnon. VL - 2 IS - 6 ER -