This study aims at examining the metaphors created by two groups of language learners in Iranian high schools (43 males and 43 females) in Famenin. Learners were required to write the metaphors which truly conceptualized their perceptions of the English educational system in Iran. Their metaphors were categorized based on the taxonomy developed by the scholars in the field (Martinez, 2001). The results highlighted remarkable points which the most important one is that; in Iran, still, most of learners work based on the principles of the behaviorists, these findings are compatible with those of Pishghadam and Mirzaee (2008) and Pishghadam et al. (2011) which asserted that Iran’s educational system is still under the influence of modernist, behaviorist and positivist views of learning.
Published in |
International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 2, Issue 3-1)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Foreign Language Teaching and Learning (Models and Beliefs) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.13 |
Page(s) | 21-31 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Metaphor, High School, Linguistic Metaphor, Beliefs and Conceptions, Conceptual Metaphor, Metaphor Analysis
[1] | Botha, E. (2009). Why metaphor matters in education. South African Journal of Education [2009] Vol.29, 431-444 |
[2] | Ding, E. & Kong, H. (2009).Metaphor and Culture. Asian Social Science, [2009], Vol. 5, No. 1. |
[3] | Ellis, R. (2008). Learner beliefs and language learning. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, Vol. 10 (4), 7-25 |
[4] | Farjami H. (2012). EFL learners’ metaphors and images about foreign language learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. Department of English Studies, Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts, Adam Mickiewicz University, Kalisz. SSLLT 2 (1) [2012]. 93-109. http://www.ssllt.amu.edu.pl |
[5] | Glogowski K. (2012). Teaching Metaphors. [2012]. http://getideas.org/getinsight/teaching- metaphors/ |
[6] | Gunbayi, I. (2011). Principals’ Perceptions on School Management: A Case Study with Metaphorical Analysis. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, [2011], 3(2), 541-561. |
[7] | Jin, L., Smith, K., Yahya, A., Chan, A., Choong, M., Lee, A., Ng, V., Poh-Wong, P. & Young, D. (2011).Perceptions and Strategies of Learning in English by Singapore Primary School Children with Dyslexia – a metaphor analysis.ELT Research Papers11–03.Montfort University and the Dyslexia Association of Singapore. |
[8] | Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980).Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
[9] | Larsen-Freeman D. (1986).Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
[10] | Lin, W., Shein, P. &Yang, S. (2012). Exploring personal EFL teaching metaphors in pre-service teacher education. English Teaching Practice and Critique, Volume 11, [2012], Number 1, pp. 183-19 http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/etpc/files/2012v11n1dial3.pdf |
[11] | Lyons J. (1981).Language and linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
[12] | Martinez, M.A., Sauleda, N., & Huber, G.L. (2001). Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 965-977 |
[13] | Morady Moghaddam, M. & Gholamzadeh, M. (2011).Delving into EFL Learners’ Cultural Conceptions through Metaphor Analysis. Cross-cultural Communication, [2011],7 (4), 91-100. |
[14] | Nikitina, L., & Furuoka, F. (2008). “A Language Teacher is Like...”: Examining Malaysian students’ perception of language teachers through metaphor analysis. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5 (2), 192-205 |
[15] | Pishghadam, R. (2008). The content analysis of the books for English language learning in Iran’s formal and informal contexts of language education in light of MI, EI and mediation theory. (Paper presented in the first conference on formal education. Iran, Ferdowsi University.) |
[16] | Pishghadam, R., & Mirzaee, A. (2008).English language teaching in postmodern era.TELL, 2,89-109. |
[17] | Pishghadam, R., Askarzadeh Torghabe, R., &Navari, S. (2009). Metaphor analysis of teachers’ beliefs and conceptions of language teaching and learning in Iranian high schools and language institutes: A qualitative study. Iranian EFL Journal, 4, 6-40 |
[18] | Pishghadam, R., Navari, S. (2010). Examining Iranian language learners’ perceptions of language education in formal and informal contexts: A quantitative study. MJAL, 2 (1), 171-185 |
[19] | Pishghadam, R., Hosseini Fatemi, A., Askarzadeh Torghabe, R., &Navari, S. (2011). Qualitative Metaphor Analysis and Language Learning Opportunities. IJAL, Vol. 14, No. 1,[2011], pp 81-115. |
[20] | Pishghadam, R., Pourali, S.(2011). Iranian PhD Students' Beliefs about Language Learning and Teaching: A Qualitative Study. World Journal of Education Vol . 1, No. 1; [2011], pp 63-71. www.sciedu.ca/wje |
[21] | Pishghadam, R., Pourali, S.(2011). Metaphorical Analysis of Iranian MA University Students’ Beliefs: A Qualitative Study. Higher Education Studies Vol. 1, No. 1; [2011], pp 27-37. www.sciedu.ca/wje |
[22] | Rahmani Samani, E. & Hashemian, M. (2012).The Effect of Conceptual Metaphors on Learning Idioms by L2 Learners. International Journal of English Linguistics Vol. 2, [2012] No. 1; 249-256. www.ccsenet.org/ijel |
[23] | Sexton.S. (2004).Prior Teacher Experiences Informing How Post-Graduate Teacher Candidates See Teaching and Themselves in the Role as the Teacher. International Education Journal Vol 5, No 2, 2004 http://iej.cjb.net |
[24] | Skaftun, A. (2011). Minding Metaphors: Rethinking the Ecology of Written Language. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 11, 39-50. |
[25] | Stichert, G. E. (2005). Preservice Science Teachers Perception of Profession with Metaphorical Images and Reasons of Choosing Teaching as a Profession. A Thesis Submitted to The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of middle east Technical University of Ankara, Turkey [ 2005]. |
[26] | Yillmaz, R. (2010). Understanding learners’ beliefs of language learning, learners, and teachers through their personal metaphors. An Action Research Project for GEDİZ UNIVERSITY. |
[27] | Zhang, F., Hu, J. (2009).A Study of Metaphor and its Application in Language learning and Teaching. International L Education Studies Vol. 2, No. 2 [2009], 77-81. |
[28] | Zhou, D. & Heineken, E. (2009). The use of metaphors in academic communication: traps or treasures. Ibérica 18 [2009], 23-49. |
APA Style
Nader Assadi Aidinlou, Fahime Farjami, Ali Rezaee Javidan. (2014). Iranian High School Students’ Beliefs about Language Learners: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3-1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.13
ACS Style
Nader Assadi Aidinlou; Fahime Farjami; Ali Rezaee Javidan. Iranian High School Students’ Beliefs about Language Learners: A Qualitative Study. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2014, 2(3-1), 21-31. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.13
AMA Style
Nader Assadi Aidinlou, Fahime Farjami, Ali Rezaee Javidan. Iranian High School Students’ Beliefs about Language Learners: A Qualitative Study. Int J Lang Linguist. 2014;2(3-1):21-31. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.13, author = {Nader Assadi Aidinlou and Fahime Farjami and Ali Rezaee Javidan}, title = {Iranian High School Students’ Beliefs about Language Learners: A Qualitative Study}, journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics}, volume = {2}, number = {3-1}, pages = {21-31}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.s.2014020301.13}, abstract = {This study aims at examining the metaphors created by two groups of language learners in Iranian high schools (43 males and 43 females) in Famenin. Learners were required to write the metaphors which truly conceptualized their perceptions of the English educational system in Iran. Their metaphors were categorized based on the taxonomy developed by the scholars in the field (Martinez, 2001). The results highlighted remarkable points which the most important one is that; in Iran, still, most of learners work based on the principles of the behaviorists, these findings are compatible with those of Pishghadam and Mirzaee (2008) and Pishghadam et al. (2011) which asserted that Iran’s educational system is still under the influence of modernist, behaviorist and positivist views of learning.}, year = {2014} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Iranian High School Students’ Beliefs about Language Learners: A Qualitative Study AU - Nader Assadi Aidinlou AU - Fahime Farjami AU - Ali Rezaee Javidan Y1 - 2014/06/14 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.13 T2 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JF - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JO - International Journal of Language and Linguistics SP - 21 EP - 31 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0221 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020301.13 AB - This study aims at examining the metaphors created by two groups of language learners in Iranian high schools (43 males and 43 females) in Famenin. Learners were required to write the metaphors which truly conceptualized their perceptions of the English educational system in Iran. Their metaphors were categorized based on the taxonomy developed by the scholars in the field (Martinez, 2001). The results highlighted remarkable points which the most important one is that; in Iran, still, most of learners work based on the principles of the behaviorists, these findings are compatible with those of Pishghadam and Mirzaee (2008) and Pishghadam et al. (2011) which asserted that Iran’s educational system is still under the influence of modernist, behaviorist and positivist views of learning. VL - 2 IS - 3-1 ER -