A Detailed Comparison Between FOC and DTC Methods of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive

Navid Maleki; Mohammad Reza Alizadeh Pahlavani; Iman Soltani

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30

| Peer-Reviewed

A Detailed Comparison Between FOC and DTC Methods of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive

Navid Maleki, Mohammad Reza Alizadeh Pahlavani, Iman Soltani

Published in Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering (Volume 3, Issue 2-1)

Received: 8 February 2015 Accepted: 9 February 2015 Published: 27 February 2015

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This paper focuses on detail comparison between two common control methods including Field Oriented Control (FOC) and Direct Torque Control (DTC) of the Permanent Magnet Synchronous (PMS) motor. The main characteristics of the motor such as torque, flux and speed under different operation conditions are studied and the advantages of FOC and DTC are obtained. It can be concluded that although both the DTC and FOC methods have different structures but the motor has the same behavior on the control methods. Thus, it is concluded that both the methods can be implemented as the Direct Flux Ccontrol (DFC) and can be applied as an optimized method of PMS motor control in the industry applications.

Published in	Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering (Volume 3, Issue 2-1) This article belongs to the Special Issue Research and Practices in Electrical and Electronic Engineering in Developing Countries
DOI	10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30
Page(s)	92-100
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

PMSM, Vector Control (VC), FOC, DTC, Optimized Control Method

References

[1]	Juha Pyrhonen. 2011, ELECTRIC-DRIVE-BASED CONTROL AND ELECTRIC ENERGY REGENERATION IN A HYDRAULIC SYSTEM.Book..
[2]	P. Pragasan, and R. Krishnan, 1998, Modeling of permanent magnet motor drives, IEEE Trans. Industrial electronics, vol. 35, no.4, nov. 1988\
[3]	Anders Kornberg, 2012, Design and Simulation of Field Oriented Control and Direct Torque Control for a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor with Positive Saliency.Thesis For M.S. degree ,uppsala university.
[4]	Thomas M. Jahns, Gerald B. Kliman, and Thomas W. Neumann. Interior permanent-magnet synchronous motors for adjustable-speed drives. IEEE Transaction on industry applications, IA-22(4):738-747, 1986.
[5]	R.D. Doncker, D.W.J. Pulle, and A. Veltman. Advanced Electrical Drives: Analysis, Modeling, Control. Power Systems. Springer, 2011. ISBN 9789400701793. URLhttp://books.google.se/books?id=\_sEDx2lAKboC.
[6]	Yi Wang and Jianguo Zhu. Modeling and implementation of an improved dsvm scheme for pmsm dtc. International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems, pages 1042-1046, 2008.
[7]	H. L. Huy, 1999, Comparison of Field-Oriented Control and Direct Torque Control for Induction Motor Drives, 0-7803-5589-X/99/10.00 © 1999 IEEE.
[8]	[8] A. Daghigh, M.B.B. Sharifian, M. Farasat, A Modified Direct Torque Control of IPM Synchronous Machine Drive With Constant Switching Frequency and Low Ripple in Torque, in Conf. 18th Iranian conference on Electrical Engineering, ICEE, Isfahan-Iran, 2010.
[9]	L. Zhong, M. F. Rahman, 1997, Analysis of Direct Torque Control in Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drives, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 12, NO. 3, MAY 1997
[10]	L. Zhong, M. F. Rahman, and K. W. Lim, 1995, A strategy for torque control for high-performance interior permanent magnet synchronous motor drives, in Proc. Australasian Univ. Power Engineering Conf., 1995, pp. 259–264.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Navid Maleki, Mohammad Reza Alizadeh Pahlavani, Iman Soltani. (2015). A Detailed Comparison Between FOC and DTC Methods of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive. Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 3(2-1), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Navid Maleki; Mohammad Reza Alizadeh Pahlavani; Iman Soltani. A Detailed Comparison Between FOC and DTC Methods of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive. J. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2015, 3(2-1), 92-100. doi: 10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Navid Maleki, Mohammad Reza Alizadeh Pahlavani, Iman Soltani. A Detailed Comparison Between FOC and DTC Methods of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive. J Electr Electron Eng. 2015;3(2-1):92-100. doi: 10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30,
  author = {Navid Maleki and Mohammad Reza Alizadeh Pahlavani and Iman Soltani},
  title = {A Detailed Comparison Between FOC and DTC Methods of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive},
  journal = {Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering},
  volume = {3},
  number = {2-1},
  pages = {92-100},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jeee.s.2015030201.30},
  abstract = {This paper focuses on detail comparison between two common control methods including Field Oriented Control (FOC) and Direct Torque Control (DTC) of the Permanent Magnet Synchronous (PMS) motor. The main characteristics of the motor such as torque, flux and speed under different operation conditions are studied and the advantages of FOC and DTC are obtained. It can be concluded that although both the DTC and FOC methods have different structures but the motor has the same behavior on the control methods. Thus, it is concluded that both the methods can be implemented as the Direct Flux Ccontrol (DFC) and can be applied as an optimized method of PMS motor control in the industry applications.},
 year = {2015}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Detailed Comparison Between FOC and DTC Methods of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive
AU  - Navid Maleki
AU  - Mohammad Reza Alizadeh Pahlavani
AU  - Iman Soltani
Y1  - 2015/02/27
PY  - 2015
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30
DO  - 10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30
T2  - Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
JF  - Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
JO  - Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
SP  - 92
EP  - 100
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2329-1605
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30
AB  - This paper focuses on detail comparison between two common control methods including Field Oriented Control (FOC) and Direct Torque Control (DTC) of the Permanent Magnet Synchronous (PMS) motor. The main characteristics of the motor such as torque, flux and speed under different operation conditions are studied and the advantages of FOC and DTC are obtained. It can be concluded that although both the DTC and FOC methods have different structures but the motor has the same behavior on the control methods. Thus, it is concluded that both the methods can be implemented as the Direct Flux Ccontrol (DFC) and can be applied as an optimized method of PMS motor control in the industry applications.
VL  - 3
IS  - 2-1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Navid Maleki

Department of Electrical Engineering, Saveh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran
Mohammad Reza Alizadeh Pahlavani

Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Malek-Ashtar University of Technology (MUT), Tehran, Iran
Iman Soltani

Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Malek-Ashtar University of Technology (MUT), Tehran, Iran

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Navid Maleki, Mohammad Reza Alizadeh Pahlavani, Iman Soltani. (2015). A Detailed Comparison Between FOC and DTC Methods of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive. Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 3(2-1), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Navid Maleki; Mohammad Reza Alizadeh Pahlavani; Iman Soltani. A Detailed Comparison Between FOC and DTC Methods of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive. J. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2015, 3(2-1), 92-100. doi: 10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Navid Maleki, Mohammad Reza Alizadeh Pahlavani, Iman Soltani. A Detailed Comparison Between FOC and DTC Methods of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive. J Electr Electron Eng. 2015;3(2-1):92-100. doi: 10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30,
  author = {Navid Maleki and Mohammad Reza Alizadeh Pahlavani and Iman Soltani},
  title = {A Detailed Comparison Between FOC and DTC Methods of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive},
  journal = {Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering},
  volume = {3},
  number = {2-1},
  pages = {92-100},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jeee.s.2015030201.30},
  abstract = {This paper focuses on detail comparison between two common control methods including Field Oriented Control (FOC) and Direct Torque Control (DTC) of the Permanent Magnet Synchronous (PMS) motor. The main characteristics of the motor such as torque, flux and speed under different operation conditions are studied and the advantages of FOC and DTC are obtained. It can be concluded that although both the DTC and FOC methods have different structures but the motor has the same behavior on the control methods. Thus, it is concluded that both the methods can be implemented as the Direct Flux Ccontrol (DFC) and can be applied as an optimized method of PMS motor control in the industry applications.},
 year = {2015}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Detailed Comparison Between FOC and DTC Methods of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive
AU  - Navid Maleki
AU  - Mohammad Reza Alizadeh Pahlavani
AU  - Iman Soltani
Y1  - 2015/02/27
PY  - 2015
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30
DO  - 10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30
T2  - Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
JF  - Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
JO  - Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
SP  - 92
EP  - 100
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2329-1605
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeee.s.2015030201.30
AB  - This paper focuses on detail comparison between two common control methods including Field Oriented Control (FOC) and Direct Torque Control (DTC) of the Permanent Magnet Synchronous (PMS) motor. The main characteristics of the motor such as torque, flux and speed under different operation conditions are studied and the advantages of FOC and DTC are obtained. It can be concluded that although both the DTC and FOC methods have different structures but the motor has the same behavior on the control methods. Thus, it is concluded that both the methods can be implemented as the Direct Flux Ccontrol (DFC) and can be applied as an optimized method of PMS motor control in the industry applications.
VL  - 3
IS  - 2-1
ER  -

Copy | Download