This study aims to adopt the balanced scorecard approach to improve the measurement and evaluating of human resources performance in the USA public sector. We use a balanced scorecard approach in terms of innovation, learning and growth for employees feeling to contribute to the governmental agency ends. Innovation, learning and growth may represent constitutive elements of organizational strategies value oriented. In this study we have built a set of key performance drivers drawn by a sample of American public employees during 2010. The United States are the first country introducing public management reform programs fostering continuous attention on human resources performances. The study is a research desk. Data are collected by United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) with regard to last Federal Employees Viewpoint Survey conducted in 2010 and concern employees of every Federal agencies which responded to the survey. The results show that the employee’s perception of the organization performance seems to be positively judged.
Published in |
Journal of Human Resource Management (Volume 3, Issue 2-1)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges and Opportunities in the Performance Measurement and Control Systems of Human Resources Management for the Services Industry |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jhrm.s.2015030201.14 |
Page(s) | 28-32 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Federal Civil Workforce, Organization Performance Measurement, Balanced Scorecard Approach
[1] | Gould-Williams J., 2003. “The importance of HR practices and workplace trust in achieving superior performance: a study of public sector organizations”. In Journal of Human Resource Management., No 14, pp 28-54. |
[2] | Blyton P. and Turnbull P., 1992, “Reassessing human resource management”, The Free Press. |
[3] | Legge K., 1995, “Human Resource Management: rhetoric and Realitie”s, in Chippenham Macmillan Business |
[4] | Boyne G., Jenkins G. Poople M. 1999, “Human resource management in the public and private sectors: an empirical comparison”. In Public Administration, vol. 77 No 2, pp 407-420 |
[5] | Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P.R., Quinn Mills, D. and Walton, R.E. 1984, Human Resource Management. New York: Free Press. |
[6] | Rainey, H., Backoff, R. W., & Levine, C. H., 1976. “Comparing public and private organizations”. In Public Administration Review, No 36 (2), pp. 233-244. |
[7] | Scott P. G. and Falcone S., 1998, “Comparing public and private organizations: An exploratory analysis of three frameworks”. In American Review of Public Administration 28 (2):126-145. |
[8] | Budhwar and Boyne, 2004. “Human Resource Management in Indian public and private sectors: an empirical comparison”. In The international Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 15, No 2, pp. 346-370. |
[9] | Box R. C., 1999, “Running Government like a business: implication for public administration theory an research”. In American Review of Public Administration, No 29, pp 19-43. |
[10] | Ferlie E. et al., 1996, “The new Public Management in action”, Oxford University Press. |
[11] | Brewster C., 1995. “Toward a ‘European’ Model of Human Resource Management”. In Journal of International Business STUDIES, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 1-21. |
[12] | Farnham D. and Horton S., 1996,. “Managing people in the public service. In Managing Social Policy”. London. McLaughlin. |
[13] | Williams, 2004. “The effects of high commitment HRM practices on employee attitude: the views of public sector workers”. In Public Administration, Vol. 82, No. 1, Pp 63-81. |
[14] | Huselid M., 1995. “The impact of Human Resource Management practices on Turnover, productivity and Corporate finance performance”, in Academy of Management Journal Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 637- 672. |
[15] | Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. . (1996). “The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance”. In Academy of Management Journal, No 39(4), pp 949–969. |
[16] | Pfeffer J., 1998. “The human equation: building profits by putting people first”. Boston Harvard Business School Press. |
[17] | Tessema M.T. and Soeters J.L., 2006. “Challenges and prospects of HRM in developing countries: testing the HRM- performance link in Eritrean civil service”. In International Journal of Resource Management, No 17(1), pp. 86-105. |
[18] | OPAC (Public Administration Observatory), 2011. “Sistemi di pubblico impiego a confronto, casi di studio internazionali”. Egea, Milano. |
[19] | Kaplan R.S. and Norton D., 1992. “The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance”, In Harvard Business Review, Jan- Feb, pp 71 – 79. |
[20] | Kloot L. and Martin J., 2000, “Strategic performance management: a balanced approach to performance management issue in local government”. In management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, pp 231 – 251. |
[21] | Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., Brignall, T. J., Silvestro, R. and Voss, C., 1991. “Perfomance Measurement in Service Businesses”, C.I.M.A. |
[22] | Ballantine, J. A., Brignall, T. J. and Modell, S., 1998. “Performance measurement and management in public health services: a comparison of UK and Swedish practice”. In Management Accounting Research, No. 9, pp.71–94. |
[23] | Aaron A. Estis KPMG Peat Marwick LLP and Grand Hyatt, 1998, “The balanced Scorecard – Applying a Private Sector Technique to the Public Sector”. Paper presented at the 1998 Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis. New York City, New York |
[24] | De Lancer Julnes P., Holzer M. “Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations: An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation”. In Public Administration Review, Vol. 61, No. 6, pp. 693-708. |
[25] | Wilson C., Hagarthy D. and Gauthier J., 2003. “Results using the balanced scorecard in the public sector”. In Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 53-63. |
[26] | Guest D. E. 2001. “Human resource management: when research confronts theory”. In International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 1092-1106. |
[27] | Kaplan R.S., Norton D. P. 2001. “Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance measurement to Strategic Management”: Part I. |
[28] | Harel D. and Tzafrir N.N. , 1999. The effect of Human Resource Management practices on the perceptions of organizational and market performance of the firm. In Human Resource Management, Vol. 38, No 3, pp185-200 |
[29] | United States Office of Personnel Management, 2014, “Annual Report Common Characteristics of the Government, Fiscal Year 2013”. |
[30] | United States Office of Personal Management, 2010, “Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey”, www.FedView.opm.gov |
APA Style
Benedetta Gesuele, Mauro Romanelli. (2015). Human Resource Measurement: A Balanced Scorecard Approach. Journal of Human Resource Management, 3(2-1), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.s.2015030201.14
ACS Style
Benedetta Gesuele; Mauro Romanelli. Human Resource Measurement: A Balanced Scorecard Approach. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2015, 3(2-1), 28-32. doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.s.2015030201.14
AMA Style
Benedetta Gesuele, Mauro Romanelli. Human Resource Measurement: A Balanced Scorecard Approach. J Hum Resour Manag. 2015;3(2-1):28-32. doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.s.2015030201.14
@article{10.11648/j.jhrm.s.2015030201.14, author = {Benedetta Gesuele and Mauro Romanelli}, title = {Human Resource Measurement: A Balanced Scorecard Approach}, journal = {Journal of Human Resource Management}, volume = {3}, number = {2-1}, pages = {28-32}, doi = {10.11648/j.jhrm.s.2015030201.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.s.2015030201.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jhrm.s.2015030201.14}, abstract = {This study aims to adopt the balanced scorecard approach to improve the measurement and evaluating of human resources performance in the USA public sector. We use a balanced scorecard approach in terms of innovation, learning and growth for employees feeling to contribute to the governmental agency ends. Innovation, learning and growth may represent constitutive elements of organizational strategies value oriented. In this study we have built a set of key performance drivers drawn by a sample of American public employees during 2010. The United States are the first country introducing public management reform programs fostering continuous attention on human resources performances. The study is a research desk. Data are collected by United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) with regard to last Federal Employees Viewpoint Survey conducted in 2010 and concern employees of every Federal agencies which responded to the survey. The results show that the employee’s perception of the organization performance seems to be positively judged.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Human Resource Measurement: A Balanced Scorecard Approach AU - Benedetta Gesuele AU - Mauro Romanelli Y1 - 2015/02/28 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.s.2015030201.14 DO - 10.11648/j.jhrm.s.2015030201.14 T2 - Journal of Human Resource Management JF - Journal of Human Resource Management JO - Journal of Human Resource Management SP - 28 EP - 32 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0715 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.s.2015030201.14 AB - This study aims to adopt the balanced scorecard approach to improve the measurement and evaluating of human resources performance in the USA public sector. We use a balanced scorecard approach in terms of innovation, learning and growth for employees feeling to contribute to the governmental agency ends. Innovation, learning and growth may represent constitutive elements of organizational strategies value oriented. In this study we have built a set of key performance drivers drawn by a sample of American public employees during 2010. The United States are the first country introducing public management reform programs fostering continuous attention on human resources performances. The study is a research desk. Data are collected by United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) with regard to last Federal Employees Viewpoint Survey conducted in 2010 and concern employees of every Federal agencies which responded to the survey. The results show that the employee’s perception of the organization performance seems to be positively judged. VL - 3 IS - 2-1 ER -